http://www.geocreationism.com/2008/01/04/%e2%80%9cevidence-for-creation%e2%80%9d-review-chapter-3-%e2%80%9cevidence-from-the-earth%e2%80%9d/ Geocreationism - Showing harmony between mainstream science and scripture Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:56:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 http://www.geocreationism.com/2008/01/04/%e2%80%9cevidence-for-creation%e2%80%9d-review-chapter-3-%e2%80%9cevidence-from-the-earth%e2%80%9d/#comment-493 Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:50:56 +0000 http://www.geocreationism.com/2008/01/04/%e2%80%9cevidence-for-creation%e2%80%9d-review-chapter-3-%e2%80%9cevidence-from-the-earth%e2%80%9d/#comment-493 [...] In “Evidence for Creation” (Review) - Chapter 3 “Evidence from the Earth”, I discussed where DeRosa criticised Evolutionists for their use of the Geological Column.  In DeRosa’s view, scientists theorized Evolution to age some fossils, used those fossils to age the layers within the Geological Column, used the Geological Column to age yet other fossils, then showed how the sequence of those fossils proved Evolution.  He called it circular, saying you cannot use a hypothesis as a premise for proving that hypothesis.  But, not only are Evolutionists not doing that, DeRosa (above) is doing that. [...] […] In “Evidence for Creation” (Review) - Chapter 3 “Evidence from the Earth”, I discussed where DeRosa criticised Evolutionists for their use of the Geological Column.  In DeRosa’s view, scientists theorized Evolution to age some fossils, used those fossils to age the layers within the Geological Column, used the Geological Column to age yet other fossils, then showed how the sequence of those fossils proved Evolution.  He called it circular, saying you cannot use a hypothesis as a premise for proving that hypothesis.  But, not only are Evolutionists not doing that, DeRosa (above) is doing that. […]

]]>