<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geocreationist Principles of Evolution</title>
	<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/</link>
	<description>"If we are out of our mind, it is for the sake of God; if we are in our right mind, it is for you." - 2 Cor. 5:13</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-5932</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 04:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-5932</guid>
					<description>randar23rhenn -- I've reciprocated your link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>randar23rhenn &#8212; I&#8217;ve reciprocated your link!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-5931</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-5931</guid>
					<description>I appreciate the listing!

In regardes to ID vs. TE, I think I'm consistent with elements of both, but I also have problems with both.  ID advocates the appearance of order as scientific evidence; though I think the order is there because God put it there, I consider it a theological argument, not a scientific one.  TE often advocates the absence of God during evolution; though I believe God often let the dominoes fall where they may, even "creating" through the seeming "randomness" that occurs, I would never call God absent, helpless, or impartial.  I believe He was active simultaneous with the processes He started.

The post above was written over 3 years ago.  My most recent post attempting to describe where I am at in the development of my thinking can be found here: http://www.geocreationism.com/2010/05/06/reconciling-evolution-with-scripture-part-4/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the listing!</p>
<p>In regardes to ID vs. TE, I think I&#8217;m consistent with elements of both, but I also have problems with both.  ID advocates the appearance of order as scientific evidence; though I think the order is there because God put it there, I consider it a theological argument, not a scientific one.  TE often advocates the absence of God during evolution; though I believe God often let the dominoes fall where they may, even &#8220;creating&#8221; through the seeming &#8220;randomness&#8221; that occurs, I would never call God absent, helpless, or impartial.  I believe He was active simultaneous with the processes He started.</p>
<p>The post above was written over 3 years ago.  My most recent post attempting to describe where I am at in the development of my thinking can be found here: <a href='http://www.geocreationism.com/2010/05/06/reconciling-evolution-with-scripture-part-4/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.geocreationism.com/2010/05/06/reconciling-evolution-with-scripture-part-4/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: randar23rhenn</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-5930</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-5930</guid>
					<description>Very interesting post. Glad I finally got back to this site, you have a lot of fantastic material. I've added you to my blogroll. 

I think your view on evolution sounds a lot more like ID than theistic evolution... at least from the material I've read on each side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post. Glad I finally got back to this site, you have a lot of fantastic material. I&#8217;ve added you to my blogroll. </p>
<p>I think your view on evolution sounds a lot more like ID than theistic evolution&#8230; at least from the material I&#8217;ve read on each side.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Founding Principles of Geocreationism &#171; Josiah Concept Ministries</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-142</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-142</guid>
					<description>[...] Theistic Evolutionists are correct that God caused mutations and allowed Natural Selection to occur. [source] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Theistic Evolutionists are correct that God caused mutations and allowed Natural Selection to occur. [source] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: State of the Blog &#124; Latin Mass &#171; Josiah Concept Ministries</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-140</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 07:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/02/13/geocreationist-principles-of-evolution/#comment-140</guid>
					<description>[...] As for articles, I noticed that Mike over at Geocreationism.com has published a few things that I just have to address (most specifically this). I think I&#8217;ll write a series of articles, but that probably depends on how much material I end up getting. A series of articles has been the SOP for me in response to a particular website in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As for articles, I noticed that Mike over at Geocreationism.com has published a few things that I just have to address (most specifically this). I think I&#8217;ll write a series of articles, but that probably depends on how much material I end up getting. A series of articles has been the SOP for me in response to a particular website in the past. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

