<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geocreationism and Concordist Theory (Part 1) - Is Geocreationism Concordism?</title>
	<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/</link>
	<description>"If we are out of our mind, it is for the sake of God; if we are in our right mind, it is for you." - 2 Cor. 5:13</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: geocreationism.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geocreationism and Concordist Theory (Part 4) - What does &#8220;literal&#8221; literally mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/#comment-293</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/#comment-293</guid>
					<description>[...] In Part 1 of this series, discussing Paul H. Seely&#8217;s article, The First Four Days of Genesis in Concordist Theory and in Biblical Context, I confirmed that Geocreationism is a Concordist Theory.  In Part 2, I explained why a significant difference between Geocreationism and other Concordist theories is that Geocreationism does not rewrite scripture to fit the accepted geologic ages.  In Part 3, I explained how Geocreationism uses science to confirm the sequence of events the scriptures record.  In this installment, I discuss Seely&#8217;s approach for interpreting Genesis as history. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Part 1 of this series, discussing Paul H. Seely&#8217;s article, The First Four Days of Genesis in Concordist Theory and in Biblical Context, I confirmed that Geocreationism is a Concordist Theory.  In Part 2, I explained why a significant difference between Geocreationism and other Concordist theories is that Geocreationism does not rewrite scripture to fit the accepted geologic ages.  In Part 3, I explained how Geocreationism uses science to confirm the sequence of events the scriptures record.  In this installment, I discuss Seely&#8217;s approach for interpreting Genesis as history. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: geocreationism.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geocreationism and Concordist Theory (Part 3) - Confirming Scripture with Science</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/#comment-291</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/#comment-291</guid>
					<description>[...] In Part 1 of this series, discussing Paul H. Seely&#8217;s article, The First Four Days of Genesis in Concordist Theory and in Biblical Context, I confirmed that Geocreationism is a Concordist Theory.  In Part 2, I explained why a significant difference between Geocreationism and other Concordist theories is that Geocreationism does not reinterpret scripture to fit the accepted geologic ages, but uses the sequence and language of the scripture to find when in the geologic record each &#8220;day age&#8221; took place.  The only scientific assumptions Geocreationism starts with is that the earth is old, and that when we find a sequence of events similar to the scriptures, the finer details may provide further insight into the scriptures&#8230; a feedback loop if you will.  In this post, I will address Seely&#8217;s scientific criticisms of Concordist Theories.  The great thing about Seely&#8217;s criticisms is that they are on the mark, or would be except that his science is understandably out of date. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Part 1 of this series, discussing Paul H. Seely&#8217;s article, The First Four Days of Genesis in Concordist Theory and in Biblical Context, I confirmed that Geocreationism is a Concordist Theory.  In Part 2, I explained why a significant difference between Geocreationism and other Concordist theories is that Geocreationism does not reinterpret scripture to fit the accepted geologic ages, but uses the sequence and language of the scripture to find when in the geologic record each &#8220;day age&#8221; took place.  The only scientific assumptions Geocreationism starts with is that the earth is old, and that when we find a sequence of events similar to the scriptures, the finer details may provide further insight into the scriptures&#8230; a feedback loop if you will.  In this post, I will address Seely&#8217;s scientific criticisms of Concordist Theories.  The great thing about Seely&#8217;s criticisms is that they are on the mark, or would be except that his science is understandably out of date. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: geocreationism.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geocreationism and Concordist Theory (Part 2) - Science before scripture?</title>
		<link>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/#comment-289</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geocreationism.com/blog/2007/11/21/geocreationism-and-concordist-theory-part-1-is-geocreationism-concordism/#comment-289</guid>
					<description>[...] geocreationism.com Geo-Creationism - Showing harmony between mainstream science and scripture      &#171; Geocreationism and Concordist Theory (Part 1) - Is Geocreationism Concordism? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] geocreationism.com Geo-Creationism - Showing harmony between mainstream science and scripture      &laquo; Geocreationism and Concordist Theory (Part 1) - Is Geocreationism Concordism? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

