GeoCreationism.com

In Does my Date for the Flood Hold Water? (Conclusion) - Yes, it does!, I was (miraculously?) able to put together a timeline that uses the precise numbers in the Bible, Science, and History.  Here is the timeline:

2807 BC - Flood Begins (established with science)
2806 BC - Flood Ends
2380 BC - God’s covenant with Abraham (Gen. 11:10-32, 12:1-4)
2165 BC - Israel lived in Canaan 215 years
2092 BC - Israel lived under Joseph’s protection and rule for 73 years
1877 BC - Israel lived in peach in Egypt for 215 years
1477 BC - Israel spent 400 years enslaved
997 BC - Solomon started building temple 480 years after leaving Israel
960 BC - Completion of the Temple (secular dating)

There are several important …

In  Does my Date for the Flood Hold Water? (Part 2), I attempted to show that with a flood date of 2807 BC, I could make reasonable assumptions about the dates in the Bible, and I could arrive at the independent, secular dates computed for the building of Solomon’s Temple.  However, I made a mathematical error.  I failed to notice that the traditional date for starting the temple was 135 years more recent than computed at http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/, not less recent. Here is a modification of the timeline with that blind correction, but no analysis:

2807 BC - Flood Begins
2808 BC - Flood Ends
2380 BC - God’s covenant with Abraham (Gen. 11:10-32, 12:1-4)
2185 BC - Joseph moved to Egypt …

As I wrote in Does my Date for the Flood Hold Water? (Part 1), the website http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/ places the building of the Solomon’s temple at 967BC, and computes this date quite convincingly from a starting point of Creation, 4000 BC.  However, this creates a disparity of 463 years between my dating of the flood and his.  Can I account for those years?

Let’s start at the end.  While secular sources would appear to agree with a dating of the temple around 960 BC, that date would appear to be the completion of the temple, not the beginning of it.  So when was the temple begun? Well, Jewish tradition places the beginning of the temple at 832 BC, 135 …

The last thing I want to do before leaving my series on the dating of the flood, the Jewish Calendar, and Adam’s birth, is to explore the ramifications of other dates.  I have found the website http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/ very useful for studying the dates in the Bible.  The author’s charts and explanations of the charts are quite clear, and provide one with much to think about.  The reason I chose to use that author’s research as a starting point for this post is because he and I have different conclusions regarding the age of the earth.  He believes the earth is young.  Though we disagree, his attitude appears admirable, and his approach reflects the PhD he claims on his site.

The primary …

As I said in God’s Sabbath Lines up with His Seeming Absence, God did appear to walk with Noah’s ancestral line.  However, I want to be more specific.  Jesus Himself walked in the Garden.  I believe it was Him who talked with Adam, and potentially the Holy Spirit who brought the animals to Adam.  God the Father was in Heaven (Jesus always refers to the Father as His Father “Who is in Heaven”).

After Adam was expelled from the garden, God was physically absent from Adam’s life.

Later on, Abel was born and sacrificed to God a lamb.  God the Father smelled the sweet aroma in Heaven, and accepted the …

In Dating the Flood (Part 7) - Methusalah’s Bar Mitzvah was After God’s Sabbath, I pointed out evidence that the Jewish Calendar begins between Genesis 2:3 and Genesis 2:4, and on Methuselah’s birthday.  The determination of these conclusions from scientific and historical evidence suggesting the flood was around 2807 BC, 702 years off the Jewish Calendar.  By tradition, the Jewish Calendar starts at Adam’s beginning, which begins traditionally at Genesis 2:4, and is thought to be 5771 years ago.  But then, adding up the generations in Genesis 5 pushes the flood out 2105 BC.  Supposing the Jewish year to be correct, supposing the …

It is an interesting question asked, in Dating the Flood (Part 6) - Is Methuselah’s Birth the Beginning of the Jewish Calendar? However, if you add up the years in Genesis 5 leading Methuselah’s birth, it only adds up to 687 years.  The Jewish calendar’s prediction for the flood is off by 700.  What of the other 13?  Well, if we are really onto something, then perhaps the calendar begins when Methuselah was 13 years old.  Why then? Well by Jewish tradition, the age of 13 is when a Jewish boy becomes a man.  But why him? Hmmmm… let’s put off answering …

As described in Dating the Flood (Part 5) - Is the Jewish Calendar off by 700 years?, the Jewish calendar would seem to predict a date for the flood that is off by 702 years. If add up the ages in Genesis 5, we get 1,656, with a skew of up to 10 years.  Suppose the skew is actually 2 years and the interpretation of the Jewish calendar is of by 700 years.  This suggests Adam was born 4,461 BC (6,471 years ago).  Why would the Jewish Calendar be off?  What happened during those 700 years, and why would the end of those years be the logical place …

In Dating the Flood (Part 4) - Is the Jewish Calendar off by 700 years?, we talked about competing dates for the flood.  If the earth was created precisely 4,000 years ago, as many Christians believe, then the genealogy in Genesis 5, and Noah’s age at the time of the flood in Genesis 7, suggest the flood occurred 1,656 years later, or 2,344 BC.  The problem is that this does not coincide with the physical evidence discussed in Dating the Flood… May 10, 2807 B.C.?.

The reason for considering 2,344 as candidate …

In Dating the Flood… May 10, 2807 B.C.?, Dating the Flood… when Science Meets History, and Scientific Dating of Sodom and Gomorrah Supports Flood Date (Yeah, I know I didn’t label any of them as “Parts”), I made the case that scientific and historical evidence may be dating the Flood to around 2800 B.C.  Interestingly, I have found that Young Earther sites tend to date the Flood to around 2344, almost 500 years later.  I understand how they reach it.  They add up the …